Ongoing commentary on the politics of climate change.

In 2009, what would presidential leadership on climate change look like, and why?


Learn more about global warming and energy issues in New Hampshire.

Resources for local energy committees

For libraries, local chambers, Rotary Clubs, and others who would be interested in a free speaker on Global Warming.
Home

The Political Climate: an ongoing commentary on the NH Primary and Climate Change

Environmental Bill Passes in the Senate

June 22nd, 2007 by Carbon Coalition

The Senate passed a key bill yesterday which the New York Times called a “major defeat for car manufacturers”- we call it a victory for the environment.  The bill significantly raises fuel efficiency standards for the first time in twenty years from an average of 25 to 35 miles per gallon by 2020.  It also mandates an increase in the use of bio fuels.  Though it was a step toward reducing carbon emissions, two important proposals were dropped from the bill before its passing:  1) Increased taxation on oil companies that would have created major incentives for research into renewable technologies; and 2) a proposal requiring utility companies to increase their share of power from renewables.

This bill provided the presidential candidates who are now incumbent senators a major opportunity to strengthen their environmental voting record.  A ‘yea’ vote for this bill boosts fuel economy.  This is especially important in New Hampshire, a state where 33.3% of the population commutes to work outside of their resident community, higher than the national average.  (For the complete CEP report click here and go to ’US State Reports’)  That being said, here is how the candidates voted:

  • Joe Biden, yea
  • Sam Brownback, not voting
  • Hillary Clinton, yea
  • Chris Dodd, yea
  • John McCain, not voting
  • Barak Obama, yea

(For a complete voting record click here

Though 20 Republicans and 45 Democrats voted in favor, the two Republican Senators running for President did not vote.  We understand the time and energy that is needed to focus on fundraising and the campaign and make no assumptions about the two candidates absent from the vote.  That being said, it would be interesting to hear Senator Brownback and Senator McCain’s position on this issue and the bill.  We urge all of the candidates to clarify their positions on both the fuel efficiency standards and the provisions that failed.  Hopefully this won’t be the last time we see legislation about tax incentives for research and development of renewable energy sources.

3 Responses to “Environmental Bill Passes in the Senate”

  1. Chuck Says:

    If the US Auto industry has to be dragged kicking and screaming into the low-carbon future then so be it. Do they think we like to see them stuck in reverse?

    Supporting our domestic auto manufacturers is something most Americans want to do and raising fuel efficiency is they way to earn our support.

  2. Carbon Coalition | Blog » Blog Archive » “No energy bill can substitute comprehensive climate change legislation” Says:

    […] Even after the Senate passed an energy bill that raised CAFE standards to 35 mpg, there was no mention of raising fuel economy standards in the house.  Read about the Senate bill in our June 22 blog.  There is also no renewable energy standard included in the bill.  Both fuel efficiency and renewable energy standards would help free our country from the environmental burden of oil and ensure that American industry not fall farther behind the curve on clean renewable energy. […]

  3. Mitch Says:

    As long as we have politicians in there that care more about money than they do the earth, and our children. We will never see the right bill passed in the US. The US and China are the only two industrialized nations that refuse to participate in carbon reduction.

Leave a Reply

Carbon Coalition Weblog is proudly powered by WordPress.
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).